Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261773AbTFVG6R (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jun 2003 02:58:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262273AbTFVG6R (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jun 2003 02:58:17 -0400 Received: from us01smtp2.synopsys.com ([198.182.44.80]:53469 "EHLO kiruna.synopsys.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261773AbTFVG6Q (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jun 2003 02:58:16 -0400 Message-ID: <3EF556D0.5060900@Synopsys.COM> Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 09:12:16 +0200 From: Harald Dunkel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030617 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kernel Mailing List Subject: 2.4.21: USB Mass Storage data integrity not assured? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 637 Lines: 24 Hi folks, This morning I tried to attach an 2.5" HD via USB2.0 to my Linux box. I got a message WARNING: USB Mass Storage data integrity not assured in kern.log, followed by billions of IO errors during mkfs. Well, I need a mass storage whose integrity _is_ assured. Is there any hope that ehci and usb-storage get improved for a 2.4.x kernel? Any patches I could try? Regards Harri - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/