Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264025AbTFVIf2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jun 2003 04:35:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264027AbTFVIf2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jun 2003 04:35:28 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:59398 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264025AbTFVIfY (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jun 2003 04:35:24 -0400 Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 09:49:10 +0100 From: Russell King To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Chris Wedgwood , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Geert Uytterhoeven , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, perex@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Isapnp warning Message-ID: <20030622094910.A10063@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Chris Wedgwood , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Geert Uytterhoeven , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, perex@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030621125111.0bb3dc1c.akpm@digeo.com> <20030622001101.GB10801@conectiva.com.br> <20030622014102.GB29661@dingdong.cryptoapps.com> <20030622014345.GD10801@conectiva.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030622014345.GD10801@conectiva.com.br>; from acme@conectiva.com.br on Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 10:43:45PM -0300 X-Message-Flag: Your copy of Microsoft Outlook is vulnerable to viruses. See www.mutt.org for more details. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1249 Lines: 31 On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 10:43:45PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > I don't know, I was just trying to figure out the impact of requiring gcc 3 > to compile the kernel. I never used gcc 2.96 btw. So, for ARM, we end up with the following gcc versions which appear to work: - gcc 2.95.3 + patch - gcc 2.95.4 - gcc 3.2.2 + patch - gcc 3.2.3 + patch - gcc 3.3 (Some of the gcc people may beg to differ, but the above list results from many reports and real life experiences from several people.) >From what I understand, the gcc people are not all that happy about the gcc 3.2.x patch, based upon the fact that it has not been applied. It is also possible that gcc 3.3 happens to work because the bug got hidden by other changes, or, the real bug did get fixed. No one seems to know. Certainly the bugzilla entry remains open and unresolved. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/