Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755217AbdGXRvV convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2017 13:51:21 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:36116 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754118AbdGXRuf (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2017 13:50:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 20:50:30 +0300 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <1500917682.2042.62.camel@hpe.com> References: <1500654661.2042.49.camel@hpe.com> <20170721140131.40079805@vento.lan> <20170721172344.GA11316@nazgul.tnic> <1500661773.2042.53.camel@hpe.com> <20170722062853.GA2050@nazgul.tnic> <1500907209.2042.55.camel@hpe.com> <20170724150432.GA31295@nazgul.tnic> <1500909372.2042.58.camel@hpe.com> <20170724153716.GA17708@nazgul.tnic> <1500911226.2042.60.camel@hpe.com> <20170724163754.GA18184@nazgul.tnic> <1500917682.2042.62.camel@hpe.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ghes_edac: add platform check to enable ghes_edac To: "Kani, Toshimitsu" CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mchehab@s-opensource.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "mchehab@kernel.org" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com" , "tony.luck@intel.com" , "lenb@kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" From: Boris Petkov Message-ID: <9152D80E-386A-4B7D-8B37-D87748675BF9@alien8.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 336 Lines: 6 On July 24, 2017 8:44:03 PM GMT+03:00, "Kani, Toshimitsu" wrote: >I assumed our platforms w/o build-in RAS do not implement GHES, If we make it a normal module, it will be decoupled from GHES and it will rely only on the whitelist to load. -- Sent from a small device: formatting sux and brevity is inevitable.