Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751365AbdGZReB (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 26 Jul 2017 13:34:01 -0400
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:40298 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750790AbdGZReA (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 26 Jul 2017 13:34:00 -0400
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 10:33:53 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@caviumnetworks.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/3] perf: cavium: Support memory controller PMU
 counters
Message-ID: <20170726173353.GB21705@kroah.com>
References: <faa339c4-b087-d970-1099-3d6cf8186545@arm.com>
 <20170726131058.GA8665@hc>
 <131179fe-42e7-f286-5bd4-801f4c93d5f9@arm.com>
 <20170726145522.GC28875@nazgul.tnic>
 <20170726151314.GA10696@hc>
 <20170726153502.GE28875@nazgul.tnic>
 <20170726154515.GA11453@hc>
 <20170726155548.GF28875@nazgul.tnic>
 <20170726161949.GB15426@kroah.com>
 <20170726163049.GG28875@nazgul.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170726163049.GG28875@nazgul.tnic>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1150
Lines: 27

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:30:49PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 09:19:49AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 05:55:48PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 05:45:15PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote:
> > > > The PMU/EDAC devices are all PCI devices do I need the 'struct pci_dev *'.
> > > > I'm not aware of other ways to access these devices. Please enlighten
> > > > me if I'm missing something.
> > > 
> > > Me enlighten you on Cavium hardware?! You're funny.
> > > 
> > > So I don't know whether the PCI hotplug code can run more than one
> > > function upon PCI ID detection. Probably Greg will say, write a
> > > multiplexer wrapper. :-)
> > 
> > -ENOCONTEXT....
> > 
> > Anyway, pci questions are best asked on the linux-pci@vger list.  And
> > yes, all PCI devices end up with a 'struct pci_dev *' automatically.
> 
> Simple: so they have a PCI ID of a memory contoller and want to hotplug
> two drivers for it. And those two drivers should remain independent from
> each other.

Hahahahaha, no.  That's crazy, you were right in guessing what my answer
was going to be :)

greg k-h