Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264448AbTFWPtN (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2003 11:49:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264449AbTFWPtN (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2003 11:49:13 -0400 Received: from lvs00-fl.valueweb.net ([216.219.253.199]:49810 "EHLO ams002.ftl.affinity.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264448AbTFWPtH (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2003 11:49:07 -0400 Message-ID: <3EF7248D.3040409@coyotegulch.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 12:02:21 -0400 From: Scott Robert Ladd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030527 Debian/1.3.1-2 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Larry McVoy CC: David Woodhouse , Stephan von Krawczynski , jgarzik@pobox.com, lawrence@the-penguin.otak.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Troll Tech [was Re: Sco vs. IBM] References: <20030620001217.G6248@almesberger.net> <20030620120910.3f2cb001.skraw@ithnet.com> <20030620142436.GB14404@work.bitmover.com> <20030620143012.GC14404@work.bitmover.com> <20030620163349.GG17563@work.bitmover.com> <20030621142048.2ae63afa.skraw@ithnet.com> <20030621133831.GA10089@work.bitmover.com> <1056358467.29264.41.camel@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> <20030623132231.GC6715@work.bitmover.com> <3EF70EF8.3050107@coyotegulch.com> <20030623150616.GA20103@work.bitmover.com> In-Reply-To: <20030623150616.GA20103@work.bitmover.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2525 Lines: 52 Larry McVoy wrote: > I think I'm going to give up soon (much to relief of the list) because I > keep getting the same sorts of answers which make sense from a small > custom shop point of view but are simply broken from a company point of > view. What's wrong with small business? Just because a model doesn't work for large companies doesn't invalidate the model. And I'm not convinced that the model fails on a larger scale. > Your model is fine, there is nothing wrong with it but there isn't a lot > right with it either. You can't really grow your business under that > model. Why? Because you are essentially a consulting shop and that > isn't going to generate the revenue you need to hire more people, build > more things, get more consulting. You can keep yourself going but not > make enough to get more people going. My business is growing; I've doubled revenues in the last year, and am building alliances with other small shops to handle larger tasks. The key, for me at least, is creating a baseline product that provides a foundation on which I build applications for clients. I'm working on two more baselines at the moment, while building a coalition to tackle larger jobs. > Instead of coming back at me with the premise of "well, I'm eating so my > model is OK" how about coming back with a plan that says "Here's how we > make an open source based business put Microsoft out of business". That's > reality. You are just playing around on the edges, there is nothing > wrong with that, but until you have a viable plan that competes with the > big boys let's stop kidding ourselves, ok? I'm not interested in playing with "the big boys", nor do I have a desire to "put Microsoft out of business.". I much prefer to play in the spaces that the big boys have no interest in. I can employ several people, have a very comfortable life, and work on projects that are far more interesting and important than replacing Microsoft. It is possible to build a quality life (and perhaps a society) from an economic model that is not founded on corporate megalomania. -- Scott Robert Ladd Coyote Gulch Productions (http://www.coyotegulch.com) Professional programming for science and engineering; Interesting and unusual bits of very free code. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/