Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751481AbdGZTBN (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:01:13 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:57035 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750898AbdGZTBL (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:01:11 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Andy Shevchenko , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Hanjun Guo , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] ACPI / boot: Not all platform require acpi_reduced_hw_init() Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 20:53:10 +0200 Message-ID: <5814320.0Xa8vJDJkv@aspire.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.12.0-rc1+; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <20170718150420.61600-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1015 Lines: 26 On Sunday, July 23, 2017 12:14:27 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Saturday, July 22, 2017 04:53:52 AM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >>> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> > On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 06:04:19 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > >>> > I'd rather do it at the time when acpi_reduced_hw_init() actually needs to be > >>> > overridden by at least one platform. > >>> > >>> Do you mean as folded into some other patch or just as a preparatory > >>> patch in some future series? > > > >> Any of the above would work for me. > > > > Logically it should be a separate change as I can see (I have already > > locally prepared patches for that one platform). > > > > Thanks for review. > > > > P.S. Are you going to apply first 3 then from this series? > > Yes, I am. So applied now, thanks!