Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 12:56:37 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 40/57] tpm: Provide strong locking for device removal
Message-ID: <20170726195636.GD30597@kroah.com>
References: <20170719111249.973558472@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20170719111251.592825675@linuxfoundation.org>
 <1501023361.12197.191.camel@codethink.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1501023361.12197.191.camel@codethink.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1263
Lines: 39

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:56:01PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 13:12 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > 
> > ------------------
> > 
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
> > 
> > commit 4e26195f240d73150e8308ae42874702e3df8d2c upstream.
> > 
> > Add a read/write semaphore around the ops function pointers so
> > ops can be set to null when the driver un-registers.
> [...]
> > @@ -49,10 +99,10 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_find_get(int c
> >  		if (chip_num != TPM_ANY_NUM && chip_num != pos->dev_num)
> >  			continue;
> >  
> > -		if (try_module_get(pos->dev.parent->driver->owner)) {
> > +		/* rcu prevents chip from being free'd */
> > +		if (!tpm_try_get_ops(pos))
> [...]
> 
> But an RCU read-side critical section is an atomic context, and
> semaphore operations can block!  Fixed upstream by:
> 
> commit 15516788e581eb32ec1c50e5f00aba3faf95d817
> Author: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date:   Mon Feb 29 08:53:02 2016 -0500
> 
>     tpm: Replace device number bitmap with IDR

Ugh, that's a big patch.

Jason, Stefan, and Jarkko, what do you think?  Should I also take this
for 4.4-stable?

thanks,

greg k-h