Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751573AbdGZUsC (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2017 16:48:02 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:41446 "EHLO aibo.runbox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751057AbdGZUsA (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2017 16:48:00 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 01/10] net: dsa: lan9303: Fixed MDIO interface To: David Miller , andrew@lunn.ch Cc: vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, corbet@lwn.net, f.fainelli@gmail.com, kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <87999a6c-4ea8-ba4c-e2db-cdb37c1c8c8a@egil-hjelmeland.no> <87lgnbgtiq.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20170726175224.GT12049@lunn.ch> <20170726.130747.9593997952509805.davem@davemloft.net> From: Egil Hjelmeland Message-ID: <7a0d712b-1626-a4e5-e366-a626bdafc6cf@egil-hjelmeland.no> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 22:47:22 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170726.130747.9593997952509805.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 842 Lines: 23 Den 26. juli 2017 22:07, skrev David Miller: > From: Andrew Lunn > Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 19:52:24 +0200 > >>>> So I really want to group the patches into only a few series in order >>>> to not spend months on the process. >> >> I strongly agree with Vivien here. Good patches get accepted in about >> 3 days. You should expect feedback within a day or two. That allows >> you to have fast cycle times for getting patches in. > > +1 > > Small simple patches will get everything in 10 times fast than if > you clump everything together into larger, harder to review ones. > Good. Just one question about process. Could I have posted my work as a RFC? To get one round of initial feedback before chopping into small patch requests. As well as indicating where I am heading. Or is that just waste of human bandwidth? Egil