Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751030AbdG0EIC (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:08:02 -0400 Received: from mail-ua0-f171.google.com ([209.85.217.171]:35043 "EHLO mail-ua0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750765AbdG0EIA (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:08:00 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170726170259.GH3053@localhost> References: <1501047404-14456-1-git-send-email-anup.patel@broadcom.com> <20170726170259.GH3053@localhost> From: Anup Patel Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 09:37:58 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Broadcom SBA-RAID driver improvements To: Vinod Koul Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Dan Williams , Florian Fainelli , Scott Branden , Ray Jui , Linux Kernel , Linux ARM Kernel , Device Tree , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, BCM Kernel Feedback Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1154 Lines: 32 On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:06:38AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: >> This patchset does various improvments to Broadcom SBA-RAID >> driver and also adds SBA-RAID DT nodes for Stingray SOC. >> >> The patches are based on "[PATCH v2 0/7] FlexRM driver improvements" >> and can also be found at sba-raid-imp-v1 branch of >> https://github.com/Broadcom/arm64-linux.git > > and i cant apply this series without these? The dependency is only because of last DT patch for stingray. We are going to separate patchset for Stingray DT changes so I will drop PATCH6 and have this part of Stingray DT patchset. > >> >> Anup Patel (6): >> dma: bcm-sba-raid: Improve memory allocation in SBA RAID driver >> dma: bcm-sba-raid: Peek mbox when we are left with no free requests >> dma: bcm-sba-raid: pre-ack async tx descriptor >> dma: bcm-sba-raid: Break sba_process_deferred_requests() into two >> parts >> dma: bcm-sba-raid: Add debugfs support > > why are these tagged dma, I have told you explcitly to fix this!! Sure, I will remove "dma:" tag in next revision. Regards, Anup