Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 14:34:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 14:34:30 -0500 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:3566 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 14:34:14 -0500 Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 14:34:10 -0500 (EST) From: Alexander Viro To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org cc: "Albert D. Cahalan" , davidge@jazzfree.com Subject: Re: simple question about patches In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [cc trimmed] On Sat, 3 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > Long ago, pre* and ac* patches were rare. Patches went from one > > Umm wrong. -ac patches for 2.2 regularly did one a day > > > line-by-line before the next one came out. Patches always applied > > easily with the (pre-POSIX?) patch command. Version numbers made > > patch is Larry Wall > > > Pre-patches go like this: > > > > 200 kB (great: read the patch) > > 200 kB + 200 kB of old stuff you already read (ugh, read 1/2 of it) > > 200 kB + 400 kB of old stuff you already read (too boring) > > Of course people with at least one functioning braincell read the differences > between the two patches, or pick up the patch between the two (handily > maintained on www.bzimage.org for the Linux 2.4ac series) ... or do something along the lines cp -rl S2 S2-ac10 bzip2 -d