Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266094AbTFWSrV (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:47:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266091AbTFWSrT (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:47:19 -0400 Received: from 153.Red-213-4-13.pooles.rima-tde.net ([213.4.13.153]:33805 "EHLO small.felipe-alfaro.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266102AbTFWSqw (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:46:52 -0400 Subject: Re: O(1) scheduler & interactivity improvements From: Felipe Alfaro Solana To: Helge Hafting Cc: John Bradford , LKML In-Reply-To: <20030623163234.GA1184@hh.idb.hist.no> References: <200306231244.h5NCiE1Q000920@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> <20030623163234.GA1184@hh.idb.hist.no> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1056394844.587.10.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 Date: 23 Jun 2003 21:00:45 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 691 Lines: 15 On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 18:32, Helge Hafting wrote: > > Well, no, opaque window moving is fine if the CPU isn't at 100%. If > > it is, I'd rather see choppy window movements than have a server > > application starved of CPU. That's just my preference, though. > > > That could be an interesting hack to a window manager - > don't start the move in opaque mode when the load is high. But there are so many window managers floating out there... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/