Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266091AbTFWS7J (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:59:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266092AbTFWS7I (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:59:08 -0400 Received: from 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk ([81.2.122.30]:44162 "EHLO 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266091AbTFWS6N (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:58:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 20:20:23 +0100 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200306231920.h5NJKNA0002045@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> To: felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org, helgehaf@aitel.hist.no Subject: Re: O(1) scheduler & interactivity improvements Cc: john@grabjohn.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 704 Lines: 17 > > > Well, no, opaque window moving is fine if the CPU isn't at 100%. If > > > it is, I'd rather see choppy window movements than have a server > > > application starved of CPU. That's just my preference, though. > > > > > That could be an interesting hack to a window manager - > > don't start the move in opaque mode when the load is high. > > But there are so many window managers floating out there... True, but FVWM is obviously the best :-). John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/