Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751976AbdG1Nrr (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 28 Jul 2017 09:47:47 -0400
Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:43700 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751893AbdG1Nrp (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 28 Jul 2017 09:47:45 -0400
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:47:36 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, alexandre.torgue@st.com,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] net-next: stmmac: support future possible different
 internal phy mode
Message-ID: <20170728134736.GC32230@lunn.ch>
References: <20170728092818.23419-1-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
 <CAGb2v66=h_5df=B0Us-kvvFg9r_qSUroDzn-xvQLSpD1d8DhBQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v66=h_5df=B0Us-kvvFg9r_qSUroDzn-xvQLSpD1d8DhBQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 850
Lines: 22

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:53:40PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Corentin Labbe
> <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > The current way to find if the phy is internal is to compare DT phy-mode
> > and emac_variant/internal_phy.
> > But it will negate a possible future SoC where an external PHY use the
> > same phy mode than the internal one.
> >
> > This patchs series adds a new way to find if the PHY is internal, via its
> > compatible.
> 
> You've already joined in on the discussion for the patch "net: stmmac:
> dwmac-rk: Add internal phy support". It is pretty much the same issue.
> Please wait for it to come to a proper conclusion. At least then we can
> agree on something so different platforms with the same problem don't
> have diverging solutions.

Yes, this is important.

     Andrew