Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752357AbdG1Ou4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:50:56 -0400 Received: from wp244.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.133.13]:54896 "EHLO wp244.webpack.hosteurope.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752337AbdG1Oux (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:50:53 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 16:50:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Marcus Wolf To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Arnd Bergmann Message-ID: <328947802.9048.1501253445374@ox.hosteurope.de> In-Reply-To: <20170728142636.e6vzzwhc53mv6qpt@mwanda> References: <20170728132339.332897-1-arnd@arndb.de> <569585967.8859.1501251665326@ox.hosteurope.de> <20170728142636.e6vzzwhc53mv6qpt@mwanda> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: pi433: use div_u64 for 64-bit division MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Medium X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.8.3-Rev29 X-Originating-Client: com.openexchange.ox.gui.dhtml X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;marcus.wolf@wolf-entwicklungen.de;1501253453;bcf09307; X-HE-SMSGID: 1db6bF-00046l-FZ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1341 Lines: 49 Hi Dan, Thanks for the hint. I don't get, what went wrong. If I take the mail from my outbox and view it, it looks nice. Seems, I really need to look for another mailtool. But for several reasons, that's not possible at the moment (slow move of 20 domains with someting arround 80 mail adresses and several mailboxes from one provider to another within the next two monthes). Sorry for any inconvenience, Marcus > Dan Carpenter hat am 28. Juli 2017 um 16:26 > geschrieben: > > > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 04:21:05PM +0200, Marcus Wolf wrote: > > Hi Arnd, > > > > we already have a patch for this: > > [PATCH 1/1] staging: pi433: fix problem with division in rf69_set_deviation > > from 20.07.2017 > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9855261/ > > > > > Maybe I did something wrong, but my first solution was exactly like your > > proposal. As far as I remeber, I wasn't able to compile it that way. > > Therefore I > > made a little bit more complicated fix. If I did something wrong and yours > > is > > fine, we should go for yours, because it is a shorter solution. > > > > Your patch doesn't apply for one thing.... :( Read > Documentation/process/email-clients.rst It probably would have been Ok > otherwise. > > I'm pretty sure that Arnd's patch is going to be fine. > > regards, > dan carpenter > >