Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 08:54:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 08:53:42 -0500 Received: from brutus.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.146]:14580 "EHLO brutus.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 08:53:38 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 11:52:56 -0200 (BRDT) From: Rik van Riel To: Christoph Rohland cc: Jonathan George , "'matthew@mattshouse.com'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: Re: 2.4.0-test10 Sluggish After Load In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2 Nov 2000, Christoph Rohland wrote: > On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > >> BTW, I think that everyone is happy with the direction of the > >> new VM. I'm looking forward to your upcoming enhancements which > >> I hope will make it in to a later 2.4 release. > > > > I'm working on it. I have no idea if it'll be ready in time > > for other 2.4 releases ... maybe stuff will be there, maybe > > it'll be 2.5 work. > > > > Of course, this also depends on the amount of people willing > > to test out new VM patches and/or help with development. > > As you know I am doing regular thrash tests and I am willing to do > this further. I would hate to see a customer go down because his > machine becomes unusable. IMHO we should try to fix this during 2.4. Agreed. Also, we don't have to have the thrashing control be too friendly, as long as it is effective and simple ;) Rik -- "What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!" -- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000 http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/