Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753334AbdG1X7l (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2017 19:59:41 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:60594 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752987AbdG1X7k (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2017 19:59:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 16:59:33 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Colin King Cc: Marcus Wolf , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3][staging-next] staging: pi433: Make a couple of functions static Message-ID: <20170728235933.GA24607@kroah.com> References: <20170718130400.25436-1-colin.king@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170718130400.25436-1-colin.king@canonical.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 580 Lines: 14 On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 02:03:58PM +0100, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King > > The functions pi433_receive and pi433_tx_thread are local to the source > and do not need to be in global scope, so make them static > > Cleans up sparse warnings: > symbol 'pi433_receive' was not declared. Should it be static? > symbol 'pi433_tx_thread' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King > Reviewed-by: Marcus Wolf Only one of the patches in this series applied :(