Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753332AbdG2CB6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2017 22:01:58 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:57804 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752996AbdG2CB4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2017 22:01:56 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 19:01:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20170728.190155.457209566729295513.davem@davemloft.net> To: alex.g@adaptrum.com Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, peppe.cavallaro@st.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] net: stmmac: Add Adaptrum Anarion GMAC glue layer From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20170728220707.13960-4-alex.g@adaptrum.com> References: <20170728220707.13960-1-alex.g@adaptrum.com> <20170728220707.13960-4-alex.g@adaptrum.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.2 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Fri, 28 Jul 2017 19:01:56 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 838 Lines: 21 From: Alexandru Gagniuc Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:07:03 -0700 > Before the GMAC on the Anarion chip can be used, the PHY interface > selection must be configured with the DWMAC block in reset. > > This layer covers a block containing only two registers. Although it > is possible to model this as a reset controller and use the "resets" > property of stmmac, it's much more intuitive to include this in the > glue layer instead. > > At this time only RGMII is supported, because it is the only mode > which has been validated hardware-wise. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc I don't see how this fits into any patch series at all. If this is part of a series you posted elsewhere, you should keep netdev@ on all such postings so people there can review the change in-context. Thanks.