Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753420AbdG2HXm (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jul 2017 03:23:42 -0400 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:18129 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752170AbdG2HXk (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jul 2017 03:23:40 -0400 Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 10:23:22 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Marcus Wolf Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org Subject: Re: Send a large patch right now or is it better to do it later? Message-ID: <20170729072322.vmezf7gn4zd33cdh@mwanda> References: <20170728132339.332897-1-arnd@arndb.de> <569585967.8859.1501251665326@ox.hosteurope.de> <20170728142636.e6vzzwhc53mv6qpt@mwanda> <643844683.9182.1501255016794@ox.hosteurope.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <643844683.9182.1501255016794@ox.hosteurope.de> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Source-IP: aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1322 Lines: 40 On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:16:56PM +0200, Marcus Wolf wrote: > Hi Greg, > > according to the proposals of Walter Harms, I revised the rf69.c: I replaced > some macros with inline functions and removed some obsolete ifdefs. According to > walter this will improve the resource situation. In addition the readybility is > enhanced, since lines got shorter. It's a quite big change, that touched nearly > every function in that file. Just send your patches, we can't discuss them without seeing them. > I was testing the new code for a while now and did not observer a problem so > far. But I don't have a kind of unit test, so my tests for sure didn't cover > everything. Any sort of testing is probably better than 70% of staging patches. :P > > Is it a good time, to submit such a change in these days, or is it prefrable to > submit it later? It doesn't matter when you send patches. > In adition, I am a bit afraid of my current mailtool doing something > unexpected... > > If you like, I can give it a try! > > Cheers, > > Marcus > P.S. Can you process diffs fom SVN, too, or is it mandatory to create the diff > with git? The patches have to be able to be applied with `cat email.txt | git am`. If you're renaming or moving files, then use git diff. Otherwise it's all fine. regards, dan carpenter