Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751704AbdGaKzo (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2017 06:55:44 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:36846 "EHLO mail-wm0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750869AbdGaKzn (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2017 06:55:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:55:40 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: "Bae, Chang Seok" , X86 ML , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linus Torvalds , Borislav Petkov , Brian Gerst , Stas Sergeev Subject: Re: FSGSBASE ABI considerations Message-ID: <20170731105540.tovjhththy2u2dtb@node.shutemov.name> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 457 Lines: 14 On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 08:05:43PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Hi all- > > Chang wants to get the FSGSBASE patches in. Here's a bit on a brain > dump on what I think the relevant considerations are and why I haven't > sent out my patches. I'm not sure if it would be relevant input for the descussion, but there's another issue with FSGSBASE vs LA57: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/9ddf602b-6c8b-8c1e-ab46-07ed12366593@redhat.com -- Kirill A. Shutemov