Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752147AbdGaMxZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2017 08:53:25 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48627 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751017AbdGaMxX (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2017 08:53:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:53:19 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Gerald Schaefer Cc: Jerome Glisse , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , Vlastimil Babka , Andrea Arcangeli , Reza Arbab , Yasuaki Ishimatsu , qiuxishi@huawei.com, Kani Toshimitsu , slaoub@gmail.com, Joonsoo Kim , Andi Kleen , Daniel Kiper , Igor Mammedov , Vitaly Kuznetsov , LKML , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Catalin Marinas , Dan Williams , Fenghua Yu , Heiko Carstens , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Martin Schwidefsky , Michael Ellerman , Paul Mackerras , Thomas Gleixner , Tony Luck , Will Deacon Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] mm, memory_hotplug: allocate memmap from hotadded memory Message-ID: <20170731125319.GA4829@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20170726083333.17754-1-mhocko@kernel.org> <20170726210657.GE21717@redhat.com> <20170727065652.GE20970@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170728121941.GL2274@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170731143521.5809a6ca@thinkpad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170731143521.5809a6ca@thinkpad> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1685 Lines: 35 On Mon 31-07-17 14:35:21, Gerald Schaefer wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:19:41 +0200 > Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Thu 27-07-17 08:56:52, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Wed 26-07-17 17:06:59, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > > [...] > > > > This does not seems to be an opt-in change ie if i am reading patch 3 > > > > correctly if an altmap is not provided to __add_pages() you fallback > > > > to allocating from begining of zone. This will not work with HMM ie > > > > device private memory. So at very least i would like to see some way > > > > to opt-out of this. Maybe a new argument like bool forbid_altmap ? > > > > > > OK, I see! I will think about how to make a sane api for that. > > > > This is what I came up with. s390 guys mentioned that I cannot simply > > use the new range at this stage yet. This will need probably some other > > changes but I guess we want an opt-in approach with an arch veto in general. > > > > So what do you think about the following? Only x86 is update now and I > > will split it into two parts but the idea should be clear at least. > > This looks good, and the kernel will also boot again on s390 when applied > on top of the other 5 patches (plus adding the s390 part here). Thanks for testing Gerald! I am still undecided whether the arch code should veto MHP_RANGE_ACCESSIBLE if it cannot be supported or just set it when it is supported. My last post did the later but the first one sounds like a more clear API to me. I will keep thinking about it. Anyway, did you have any chance to consider mapping the new physical memory range inside arch_add_memory rather than during online on s390? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs