Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752422AbdGaOrF (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:47:05 -0400
Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:46073 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752112AbdGaOrD (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:47:03 -0400
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:47:00 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Egil Hjelmeland <privat@egil-hjelmeland.no>
Cc: vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: dsa: lan9303: Simplify
 lan9303_xxx_packet_processing() usage
Message-ID: <20170731144700.GG24562@lunn.ch>
References: <20170731113355.4284-1-privat@egil-hjelmeland.no>
 <20170731113355.4284-3-privat@egil-hjelmeland.no>
 <20170731134640.GD24562@lunn.ch>
 <83b3fb27-97dd-a9ea-e0db-017d616f93fe@egil-hjelmeland.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <83b3fb27-97dd-a9ea-e0db-017d616f93fe@egil-hjelmeland.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 479
Lines: 19

> >Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
> >
> >     Andrew
> >
> 
> Hi Andrew
> 
> This time I took the extra effort to split my  original patch...
> 
> Your lan9303_write_switch_port suggestion (in previous reply) is fine.
> And I can improve the coverletter.
> 
> So I will do a v2 of the patch. But what is your advice:
> Should I squash the patch?

I already gave my Reviewed-by:, meaning i don't really care. Merged or
squashed is a minor point in this case.

	 Andrew