Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752435AbdGaP64 (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:58:56 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:51920 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751951AbdGaP6y (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:58:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 08:58:50 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Laurentiu Tudor Cc: Stephen Rothwell , "heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com" , Linux-Next Mailing List , LKML Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure in the staging tree (Was: kisskb: FAILED linux-next/s390-allmodconfig/s390x Mon Jul 31, 17:24) Message-ID: <20170731155850.GD1262@kroah.com> References: <20170731072425.1.95853@222023911cb9> <20170731193546.6d0538cf@canb.auug.org.au> <597EFE81.9010407@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <597EFE81.9010407@nxp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 572 Lines: 16 On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:55:14AM +0000, Laurentiu Tudor wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > That's because the fsl-mc driver selects GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN and not > all arches implement the support for the option. I can submit a patch > that adds explicit dependencies on arches that it was build-tested (x86, > arm, powerpc, all both 32 and 64 bits) similar to how it's done here > [1]. Let me know if you're ok with this fix and i'll submit the fix to > staging. Ugh, you should not be selecting that option, but rather depending on the option, right? thanks, greg k-h