Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751700AbdHAFLZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2017 01:11:25 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f49.google.com ([209.85.218.49]:34790 "EHLO mail-oi0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751102AbdHAFLX (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2017 01:11:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1501545093-56634-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 22:11:22 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: oYmgwHL6KwsKYjCcPHITJqsQXcc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] exec: Use sane stack rlimit under secureexec To: Kees Cook Cc: James Morris , Andrew Morton , David Howells , "Eric W. Biederman" , John Johansen , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Paul Moore , Stephen Smalley , Casey Schaufler , Tetsuo Handa , James Morris , Andy Lutomirski , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-security-module , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 672 Lines: 15 On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > > Yeah, I'm open to whatever. It's not clear where it should go, but if > you want to take it and Linus doesn't want it "early", that works for > me. Linus, Andrew, thoughts? I'd actually like this to go in separately from all the other security stuff. And I just checked this on a separate branch, just because I wanted to see what the overall diff was. There's a conflict with apparmor already - the resolution looks fairly straightforward, but considering the area this touches, it would probably be good that Kees keeps this branch and verifies things like that. Linus