Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 14:37:03 +0300
From: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] arm64: introduce mm_context_t flags
Message-ID: <20170801113703.ufn7tg2lvn4mr3so@yury-thinkpad>
References: <20170731144825.31322-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
 <5e0f1ae7-3a69-0d1c-3f33-ddb44ed8b6c5@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5e0f1ae7-3a69-0d1c-3f33-ddb44ed8b6c5@redhat.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:99
SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Aug 2017 11:37:19.5237 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN4PR07MB2114
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 394
Lines: 13

On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 09:10:05AM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> 
> 
> On Monday 31 July 2017 08:18 PM, Yury Norov wrote:
> >   - If we start using TIF flags here, we cannot easily add new mm_context
> >     specific bits because they may mess with TIF ones.
> 
> This one seems convincing argument. ATM do you have any mm_context flag
> which would you like to incorporate?

I think no

Yury