Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 16:58:44 +0200
From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
To: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        linux@armlinux.org.uk, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        mchehab@kernel.org, cov@codeaurora.org,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>, david.daney@cavium.com,
        mark.rutland@arm.com, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        stefan@hello-penguin.com, Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>,
        wcohen@redhat.com, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        shankerd@codeaurora.org, vladimir.murzin@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        KVM General <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/38] KVM: arm/arm64: Check if nested
 virtualization is in use
Message-ID: <20170801145844.GK5176@cbox>
References: <1500397144-16232-1-git-send-email-jintack.lim@linaro.org>
 <1500397144-16232-5-git-send-email-jintack.lim@linaro.org>
 <20170730195949.GF5176@cbox>
 <CAHyh4xi0hQE2kxOY78_25GwRsCCjMwOt0Lj=Jv1Vs1LdTUO+pQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHyh4xi0hQE2kxOY78_25GwRsCCjMwOt0Lj=Jv1Vs1LdTUO+pQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 3060
Lines: 85

On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 10:07:40AM -0400, Jintack Lim wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:58:30AM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:
> >> Nested virtualizaion is in use only if all three conditions are met:
> >> - The architecture supports nested virtualization.
> >> - The kernel parameter is set.
> >> - The userspace uses nested virtualiztion feature.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h   | 11 +++++++++++
> >>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  2 ++
> >>  arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c           | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >>  virt/kvm/arm/arm.c                |  4 ++++
> >>  4 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >> index 00b0f97..7e9e6c8 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >> @@ -303,4 +303,15 @@ static inline int __init kvmarm_nested_cfg(char *buf)
> >>  {
> >>       return 0;
> >>  }
> >> +
> >> +static inline int init_nested_virt(void)
> >> +{
> >> +     return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static inline bool nested_virt_in_use(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >> +{
> >> +     return false;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  #endif /* __ARM_KVM_HOST_H__ */
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >> index 6df0c7c..86d4b6c 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >> @@ -387,5 +387,7 @@ static inline void __cpu_init_stage2(void)
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  int __init kvmarm_nested_cfg(char *buf);
> >> +int init_nested_virt(void);
> >> +bool nested_virt_in_use(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> >>
> >>  #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_HOST_H__ */
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> >> index 79f38da..9a05c76 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> >> @@ -24,3 +24,20 @@ int __init kvmarm_nested_cfg(char *buf)
> >>  {
> >>       return strtobool(buf, &nested_param);
> >>  }
> >> +
> >> +int init_nested_virt(void)
> >> +{
> >> +     if (nested_param && cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_NESTED_VIRT))
> >> +             kvm_info("Nested virtualization is supported\n");
> >> +
> >> +     return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +bool nested_virt_in_use(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >> +{
> >> +     if (nested_param && cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_NESTED_VIRT)
> >> +         && test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_NESTED_VIRT, vcpu->arch.features))
> >> +             return true;
> >
> > you could initialize a bool in init_nested_virt which you then check
> > here to avoid duplicating the logic.
> 
> I can make a bool to check the kernel param and the capability. The
> third one is per VM given by the userspace, so we don't know it when
> we initialize the host hypervisor. We can potentially have a bool in
> kvm_vcpu_arch or kvm_arch to cache the whole three conditions, if that
> sounds ok.
> 

Yes, that sounds good to me.

Thanks,
-Christoffer