Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 18:28:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 18:28:44 -0500 Received: from mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com ([216.71.84.35]:41514 "EHLO mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 18:28:31 -0500 Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 17:28:22 -0600 From: Philipp Rumpf To: Francis Galiegue Cc: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, Kernel list Subject: Re: [kernel] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.2: cure the kapm-idled taking (100-epsilon)% CPU time Message-ID: <20010303172822.A18970@mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: ; from Francis Galiegue on Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 12:19:07AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 12:19:07AM +0100, Francis Galiegue wrote: > Well, from reading the source, I don't see how this can break APM... What am I > missing? apm_bios_call must not be called with two identical pointers for two different registers. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/