Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264546AbTFYP2N (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:28:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264551AbTFYP2M (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:28:12 -0400 Received: from dm2-58.slc.aros.net ([66.219.220.58]:5808 "EHLO cyprus") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264546AbTFYP2I (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:28:08 -0400 Message-ID: <3EF9C2D8.5060801@aros.net> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:42:16 -0600 From: Lou Langholtz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Peloquin Cc: linux-kernel , linstab , ltp-results Subject: Re: [Fwd: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.73, -bk1, -bk2, -mm1 regression results] References: <3EF9BF57.5090309@austin.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <3EF9BF57.5090309@austin.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2735 Lines: 64 Mark Peloquin wrote: > Nightly Regression Summary > for > 2.5.72 vs 2.5.73 > > > Benchmark Pass/Fail Improvements Regressions > Results Results Summary > --------------- --------- ------------ ----------- > ----------- ----------- ------- > > dbench.ext2 P N N > 2.5.72 2.5.73 report > dbench.ext3 P Y N > 2.5.72 2.5.73 report > dbench.jfs P N N > 2.5.72 2.5.73 report > dbench.reiser P N N > 2.5.72 2.5.73 report > dbench.xfs P N N > 2.5.72 2.5.73 report > kernbench P N N > 2.5.72 2.5.73 report > lmbench P Y Y > 2.5.72 2.5.73 report > rawiobench P N Y > 2.5.72 2.5.73 report > specjbb P Y Y > 2.5.72 2.5.73 report > specsdet P N Y > 2.5.72 2.5.73 report > tbench P Y N > 2.5.72 2.5.73 report > tiobench.ext2 P N N > 2.5.72 2.5.73 report > tiobench.ext3 P Y Y > 2.5.72 2.5.73 report > tiobench.jfs P N N > 2.5.72 2.5.73 report > tiobench.reiser P Y Y > 2.5.72 2.5.73 report > tiobench.xfs P N Y > 2.5.72 2.5.73 report > volanomark P N N > 2.5.72 2.5.73 report > > http://ltcperf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/data/2.5.73/2.5.72-vs-2.5.73/ > > Nightly Regression Summary > for . . . Wow! This is impressive. I'd love to see this include performance of ext3 (or jfs) over NBD (network block device) too. Or at least performance metrics like this for NBD some other way. I've done some benchmarking myself for the work I've been doing on NBD but nothing near this comprehensive. If someone had the spare time to do this though for NBD, it'd help me enormously. Any interest??? :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/