Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751809AbdHCIpw (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2017 04:45:52 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f49.google.com ([209.85.218.49]:33890 "EHLO mail-oi0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751213AbdHCIpt (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2017 04:45:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20170724065146.GA22330@spreadtrum.com> From: Baolin Wang Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 16:45:47 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: Add Spreadtrum I2C controller documentation To: Peter Rosin Cc: wsa@the-dreams.de, Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Mark Brown , wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by nfs id v738jvTm028052 Content-Length: 2098 Lines: 58 On 3 August 2017 at 16:26, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2017-08-03 09:29, Baolin Wang wrote: >> Hi Wolfram, >> >> On 27 July 2017 at 17:29, Baolin Wang wrote: >>> Hi Wolfram, >>> >>> On 24 July 2017 at 14:51, Baolin Wang wrote: >>>> Hi Wolfram, >>>> >>>> On 五, 7月 14, 2017 at 05:01:10下午 +0800, Baolin Wang wrote: >>>>> This patch adds the binding documentation for Spreadtrum I2C >>>>> controller device. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang >>>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring >>>>> --- >>>>> Changes since v3: >>>>> - Add Ack from RobH. >>>>> >>>>> Changes since v2: >>>>> - Change compatible strings to be SoC specific. >>>>> >>>>> Changes since v1: >>>>> - No updates. >>>>> --- >>>> >>>> Could you apply this patchset if there are no other comments? >>>> It is a long time since the v4 was send out. Thanks. >>> >>> Ping? >> >> Since this patchset has waited for a long time, could you pick up this >> patchset into your branch? Thanks. > > Please calm down. You first sent v4 4 weeks ago in the beginning of the > merge window when everybody are supposedly looking at the integration of > the work from the previous cycle. You have managed to send remainders > four times in those few weeks. > > Four weeks is not a "long time", and it's not like you didn't get any > feedback. Part of that feedback was that there was room for improvement. > Have you looked into that? Or have you been busy sending pings? I'm sure > Wolfram will pick the series in time for the next merge window if he's > happy with it, there was that thing about room for improvement... Sorry for noise. I just afraid Wolfram missed this patchset since I did not get any comments from V4. Yes, I've looked at how to improve, one thing is we can change readb/writeb to readsb/writesb. I will submit one patch to fix this after Andy's patches which fixing the readsb/writesb issue on x86 platform were merged. Anyway I will be keep patient and wait for comments. Thanks. -- Baolin.wang Best Regards