Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751834AbdHCJFl (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2017 05:05:41 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:34445 "EHLO mail-oi0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751226AbdHCJFi (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2017 05:05:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170803090041.GB2574@katana> References: <20170724065146.GA22330@spreadtrum.com> <20170803090041.GB2574@katana> From: Baolin Wang Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 17:05:37 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: Add Spreadtrum I2C controller documentation To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Peter Rosin , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Mark Brown , wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 622 Lines: 22 Hi Wolfram, On 3 August 2017 at 17:00, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi, > >> Sorry for noise. I just afraid Wolfram missed this patchset since I >> did not get any comments from V4. > > I use patchwork. Patches don't get lost :) > > Anyway, I nearly finished a document I can point people to when they > wonder what happened about their patches. > > I hope this will help because I don't have the bandwidth to reply to > ping mails individually and explain the situation. That's great. I can understand and thanks for your feedback. I will keep calm down and wit for comments. -- Baolin.wang Best Regards