Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752099AbdHCMZb (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2017 08:25:31 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:49487 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751207AbdHCMZ3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2017 08:25:29 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,315,1498546800"; d="scan'208";a="295227646" Message-ID: <598316DB.4050308@intel.com> Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 20:28:11 +0800 From: Wei Wang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pankaj Gupta CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mst@redhat.com, mhocko@kernel.org, mawilcox@microsoft.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, david@redhat.com, cornelia huck , mgorman@techsingularity.net, aarcange@redhat.com, amit shah , pbonzini@redhat.com, liliang opensource , yang zhang wz , quan xu Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 5/5] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_VQ References: <1501742299-4369-1-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <1501742299-4369-6-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <147332060.38438527.1501748021126.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <147332060.38438527.1501748021126.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1053 Lines: 37 On 08/03/2017 04:13 PM, Pankaj Gupta wrote: >> >> + /* Allocate space for find_vqs parameters */ >> + vqs = kcalloc(nvqs, sizeof(*vqs), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!vqs) >> + goto err_vq; >> + callbacks = kmalloc_array(nvqs, sizeof(*callbacks), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!callbacks) >> + goto err_callback; >> + names = kmalloc_array(nvqs, sizeof(*names), GFP_KERNEL); > > is size here (integer) intentional? Sorry, I didn't get it. Could you please elaborate more? > >> + if (!names) >> + goto err_names; >> + >> + callbacks[0] = balloon_ack; >> + names[0] = "inflate"; >> + callbacks[1] = balloon_ack; >> + names[1] = "deflate"; >> + >> + i = 2; >> + if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_STATS_VQ)) { >> + callbacks[i] = stats_request; > just thinking if memory for callbacks[3] & names[3] is allocated? Yes, the above kmalloc_array allocated them. Best, Wei