Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 13:09:08 -0700
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Ian Soboroff <ian.soboroff@nist.gov>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Relieving lowmem pressure on a highmem box, 2.4
Message-ID: <376190000.1056571747@[10.10.2.4]>
In-Reply-To: <m3k7balz8w.fsf@nist.gov>
References: <m3k7balz8w.fsf@nist.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1924
Lines: 41

> I have a Dell server with 12GB of RAM in it which is having a lot of
> trouble with lowmem pressure.  wli's bloatmeter script shows that it's
> a lot of buffer-heads and inodes.
> 
> $ bloatmost | head -4
>          buffer_head:   191316KB   211893KB   90.28
>          inode_cache:    64813KB    66097KB   98.5
>              size-64:       82KB    10871KB    0.75
>              size-32:       95KB     5694KB    1.68
> 
> $ cat /proc/slabinfo | sort -k 2,2n | tail
> size-512            1052   1176    512  132  147    1 :  124   62
> dentry_cache        1068   2580    128   86   86    1 :  252  126
> blkdev_requests     1200   1200    128   40   40    1 :  252  126
> filp                1230   1230    128   41   41    1 :  252  126
> size-32             1532  91118     64   42 1571    1 :  252  126
> pte_chain           2466  13050    128  157  435    1 :  252  126
> size-128            2946   3450    128  115  115    1 :  252  126
> vm_area_struct      3192   4830    128  138  161    1 :  252  126
> inode_cache       129503 132195    512 18885 18885    1 :  124   62
> buffer_head       2043732 2260200     96 56450 56505    1 :  252  126
> 
> What's a good solution for this?  I'm not ready to move to 2.5, since
> stability is pretty important for us, but patching 2.4 should be OK.
> The current kernel is RedHat's 2.4.20-18.8 (SMP, BIGMEM; HIGHMEM
> option set to 64GB).

Try 2.4-aa kernel - it copes much better with buffer_head bloat in
most circumstances. 

As long as your drivers are supported, 2.5 is actually mind-bogglingly 
stable on the whole - more so for large ia32 machines than any 2.4 
kernel I've seen (exactly because of lowmem issues).

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/