Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751948AbdHDCLM (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2017 22:11:12 -0400 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([218.249.47.110]:42905 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751231AbdHDCLL (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2017 22:11:11 -0400 Message-ID: <1501812663.25536.116.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: mtu3: add a vbus debugfs interface From: Chunfeng Yun To: Greg Kroah-Hartman CC: Felipe Balbi , Mathias Nyman , Matthias Brugger , , , , Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 10:11:03 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20170803160135.GC20736@kroah.com> References: <1501749439-8837-1-git-send-email-chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com> <20170803160057.GB20736@kroah.com> <20170803160135.GC20736@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2596 Lines: 75 On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 09:01 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 09:00:57AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 04:37:18PM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote: > > > +static ssize_t ssusb_vbus_write(struct file *file, > > > + const char __user *ubuf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos) > > > +{ > > > + struct seq_file *sf = file->private_data; > > > + struct ssusb_mtk *ssusb = sf->private; > > > + struct otg_switch_mtk *otg_sx = &ssusb->otg_switch; > > > + char buf[16]; > > > + > > > + if (copy_from_user(&buf, ubuf, min_t(size_t, sizeof(buf) - 1, count))) > > > + return -EFAULT; > > > + > > > + if (!strncmp(buf, "on", 2)) { > > > + ssusb_set_vbus(otg_sx, 1); > > > + } else if (!strncmp(buf, "off", 3)) { > > > + ssusb_set_vbus(otg_sx, 0); > > > > kstrtobool() is better to use here. Ok > > > > > +static int ssusb_debugfs_init(struct ssusb_mtk *ssusb) > > > { > > > struct dentry *root; > > > struct dentry *file; > > > > > > root = debugfs_create_dir(dev_name(ssusb->dev), usb_debug_root); > > > if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(root)) { > > > > That test is wrong, you should never need to care about the return value > > of a debugfs call. You can always just use it in your next call (if it > > is a dentry *), or just ignore it. Ok, I'll just test NULL pointer, and ignore other ERROR value > > > > > - if (!root) > > > - dev_err(ssusb->dev, "create debugfs root failed\n"); > > > - return; > > > + dev_err(ssusb->dev, "create debugfs root failed\n"); > > > + goto err_dbgfs; > > > } > > > ssusb->dbgfs_root = root; > > > > > > - file = debugfs_create_file("mode", S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, root, > > > - ssusb, &ssusb_mode_fops); > > > - if (!file) > > > - dev_dbg(ssusb->dev, "create debugfs mode failed\n"); > > > + file = debugfs_create_file("mode", 0644, root, ssusb, &ssusb_mode_fops); > > > + if (!file) { > > > + dev_err(ssusb->dev, "create debugfs mode failed\n"); > > > > Same here, do not care, as it does not matter. Actually, you don't even > > need to keep the file pointer around, right? Yes, you are right > > > > > + goto err_dbgfs; > > > + } > > > + > > > + file = debugfs_create_file("vbus", 0644, root, ssusb, &ssusb_vbus_fops); > > > + if (!file) { > > > > Same here, you don't care if debugfs fails or not, it should never > > affect your code flow. Ok Thanks a lot > > > > And don't you need to remove the directory when your module/hardware is > > removed? I don't see that happening here as you are not saving root off > > anywhere. > > Oh nevermind, you do save it, sorry for the noise... > > greg k-h