Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752702AbdHDNgB (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2017 09:36:01 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f194.google.com ([209.85.223.194]:38620 "EHLO mail-io0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751987AbdHDNgA (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2017 09:36:00 -0400 From: Vince Weaver X-Google-Original-From: Vince Weaver Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 09:35:57 -0400 (EDT) X-X-Sender: vince@macbook-air To: Peter Zijlstra cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Stephane Eranian Subject: Re: [patch] perf wrong enabled time after attach/enable/enable In-Reply-To: <20170804112253.vk4rg334732f4s7x@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Message-ID: References: <20170802171051.zlq5rgx3jqkkxpg7@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20170804112253.vk4rg334732f4s7x@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 514 Lines: 16 On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Testing if userspace rdpmc reads are supported... NEW BEHAVIOR > Testing if rdpmc fallback works on sw events... PASSED > Testing if userspace rdpmc reads give expected results... PASSED > > is that 'NEW BEHAVIOR' thing something I should worry about? no, sorry, I've been working on cleaning up the outputs of the tests to be less confusing. NEW BEHAVIOR here means it has the "new" (since Linux 3.12) cap_usr_rdpmc bit layout. Vince