Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265179AbTFYXGT (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 19:06:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265182AbTFYXGT (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 19:06:19 -0400 Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.131.35]:45274 "EHLO relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265179AbTFYXE4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 19:04:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 19:19:06 -0400 From: Scott McDermott To: Jonathan Hudson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: weird postfix mailspool corruption with 2.4.21-ac2+ (was Re: Linux 2.4.21-ac3) Message-ID: <20030625191906.C9146@newbox.localdomain> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from jonathan@daria.co.uk on Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 11:34:53PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 605 Lines: 13 Jonathan Hudson on Wed 25/06 23:34 +0100: > No AIC or any kind here. Bring on the next suspect. does changing the unix_dgram_ops `poll' op from `dgram_poll' to `datagram_poll' in net/unix/af_unix.c change anything for you? I can't test this myself until later this week. Also I don't know what other bug the unix_peer_get() addition is supposed to fix, so... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/