Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265276AbTFZBCm (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 21:02:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265338AbTFZA5H (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 20:57:07 -0400 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.129]:24828 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265247AbTFZAvk (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 20:51:40 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 18:02:40 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] pci_name() Message-ID: <20030626010239.GB15189@kroah.com> References: <20030625233525.GB451@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030626003620.GB13892@kroah.com> <20030626005315.GD451@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030626005315.GD451@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1596 Lines: 35 On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:53:15AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 05:36:20PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:35:25AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > > > I'd kind of like to get rid of pci_dev->slot_name. It's redundant with > > > pci_dev->dev.bus_id, but that's one hell of a search and replace job. > > > So let me propose pci_name(pci_dev) as a replacement. That has the > > > > That sounds reasonable. But do we really need to do this for 2.6? > > > > Just trying to keep things sane... > > I think we really do need to introduce pci_name() for 2.6 (and put it > in 2.4 too). We don't need to eliminate pci_dev->slot_name for 2.6, > but drivers that care need to be able to tell the user which card is > a message is referring to. With overlapping pci bus numbers, the 8 > bytes of bus:device.func is no longer unique, so we need to report the > domain number too. > > That information's already placed in bus_id, but as I said, I don't > want to start converting all the drivers. We could just make slot_name > larger (Anton posted a patch for this) but I don't want to make pci_dev > even bigger. Having a nice interface like pci_name() makes drivers more > portable between 2.4, 2.6 and 2.8 (as Jeff pointed out). Ok, I'll buy that, feel free to send the patch :) thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/