Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265293AbTFZBCm (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 21:02:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265295AbTFZBAW (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 21:00:22 -0400 Received: from mail.webmaster.com ([216.152.64.131]:62445 "EHLO shell.webmaster.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265293AbTFZA7a (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 20:59:30 -0400 From: "David Schwartz" To: "Gerald Stuhrberg" , Subject: RE: Sco vs. IBM Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:12:45 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <1056494253.3627.15.camel@localhost> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 669 Lines: 22 > I just have one quick queston while all of you are debating. If how is > it right for SCO to target IBM (or any company for that manner) if the > code doesnt belong to them. > > Sorry for the ignorance. I missed something somewhere :/ > > Gerald You should really look at the specific claims in the SCO lawsuit if you want to understand them. Basically, they're saying that IBM violated the terms of a contract. DS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/