From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com>,
        AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel-vbtn: match power button on press rather than release
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2017 00:20:22 +0200
Message-ID: <1700343.1Fm4iKlbcW@aspire.rjw.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20170805205753.GA1277@fury>
References: <1501866006-24811-1-git-send-email-mario.limonciello@dell.com> <11471111.T3jHVeqpMT@aspire.rjw.lan> <20170805205753.GA1277@fury>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1809
Lines: 44

On Saturday, August 5, 2017 10:57:53 PM CEST Darren Hart wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 01:30:20AM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, August 4, 2017 7:29:53 PM CEST Darren Hart wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 12:00:06PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > > > This fixes a problem where the system gets stuck in a loop
> > > > unable to wakeup via power button in s2idle.
> > > > 
> > > > The problem happens because:
> > > >  - press power button:
> > > >    - system emits 0xc0 (power press), event ignored
> > > >    - system emits 0xc1 (power release), event processed,
> > > >      emited as KEY_POWER
> > > >    - set wakeup_mode to true
> > > >    - system goes to s2idle
> > > >  - press power button
> > > >    - system emits 0xc0 (power press), wakeup_mode is true,
> > > >      system wakes
> > > >    - system emits 0xc1 (power release), event processed,
> > > >      emited as KEY_POWER
> > > >    - system goes to s2idle again
> > > > 
> > > > To avoid this situation, process the presses (which matches what
> > > > intel-hid does too).
> > > > 
> > > > Verified on an Dell XPS 9365
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com>
> > > 
> > > This looks good to me - responding to the release is non-intuitive IMHO
> > > anyway.  I'd like to see agreement from AceLan, but this should go into
> > > the 4.13 rc cycle (at rc3 currently).
> > 
> > Yes, it should, and I'm not sure if the original author's opinion matters here.
> > 
> > The patch makes sense to everyone involved and fixes an annoying issue, so
> > I don't see any real arguments against applying it.
> > 
> > Please feel free to add my ACK to it if that helps.
> 
> I always try to give those in MAINTAINERS a chance to respond, but I will queue
> this up to fixes now.

Thanks!