Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751857AbdHGDru (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Aug 2017 23:47:50 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:49986 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751411AbdHGDrs (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Aug 2017 23:47:48 -0400 Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2017 20:47:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20170806.204744.1934067595236180060.davem@davemloft.net> To: dingtianhong@huawei.com Cc: leedom@chelsio.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com, helgaas@kernel.org, werner@chelsio.com, ganeshgr@chelsio.com, asit.k.mallick@intel.com, patrick.j.cramer@intel.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com, Bob.Shaw@amd.com, l.stach@pengutronix.de, amira@mellanox.com, gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com, David.Laight@aculab.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Add new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1501917313-9812-1-git-send-email-dingtianhong@huawei.com> References: <1501917313-9812-1-git-send-email-dingtianhong@huawei.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.2 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Sun, 06 Aug 2017 20:47:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 655 Lines: 14 From: Ding Tianhong Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 15:15:09 +0800 > Some devices have problems with Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed > Ordering Attribute set. This patch set adds a new PCIe Device Flag, > PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING, a set of PCI Quirks to catch some known > devices with Relaxed Ordering issues, and a use of this new flag by the > cxgb4 driver to avoid using Relaxed Ordering with problematic Root Complex > Ports. > > It's been years since I've submitted kernel.org patches, I appolgise for the > almost certain submission errors. Which tree should merge this? The PCI tree or my networking tree?