Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751977AbdHGEOt (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2017 00:14:49 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:3012 "EHLO szxga04-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751795AbdHGEOr (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2017 00:14:47 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Add new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag To: David Miller , , References: <1501917313-9812-1-git-send-email-dingtianhong@huawei.com> <20170806.204744.1934067595236180060.davem@davemloft.net> CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , From: Ding Tianhong Message-ID: <588b378c-249a-36b0-8890-769258fbb708@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 12:13:17 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170806.204744.1934067595236180060.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.23.32] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A010203.5987E8F2.0003,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2014-11-16 11:51:01, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 0aa77b753cfb646aeec598ba8cf4aab8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1098 Lines: 34 On 2017/8/7 11:47, David Miller wrote: > From: Ding Tianhong > Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 15:15:09 +0800 > >> Some devices have problems with Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed >> Ordering Attribute set. This patch set adds a new PCIe Device Flag, >> PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING, a set of PCI Quirks to catch some known >> devices with Relaxed Ordering issues, and a use of this new flag by the >> cxgb4 driver to avoid using Relaxed Ordering with problematic Root Complex >> Ports. >> >> It's been years since I've submitted kernel.org patches, I appolgise for the >> almost certain submission errors. > > Which tree should merge this? The PCI tree or my networking tree? > Hi David: I think networking tree merge it is a better choice, as it mainly used to tell the NIC drivers how to use the Relaxed Ordering Attribute, and later we need send patch to enable RO for ixgbe driver base on this patch. But I am not sure whether Bjorn has some of his own view. :) Hi Bjorn: Could you help review this patch or give some feedback ? Thanks Ding > . >