Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262273AbTFZS3u (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2003 14:29:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262283AbTFZS3u (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2003 14:29:50 -0400 Received: from smtp.bitmover.com ([192.132.92.12]:11147 "EHLO smtp.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262273AbTFZS3t (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2003 14:29:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 11:40:33 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Larry McVoy , David Woodhouse , Scott Robert Ladd , Stephan von Krawczynski , jgarzik@pobox.com, lawrence@the-penguin.otak.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Troll Tech [was Re: Sco vs. IBM] Message-ID: <20030626184033.GA14299@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Adrian Bunk , Larry McVoy , David Woodhouse , Scott Robert Ladd , Stephan von Krawczynski , jgarzik@pobox.com, lawrence@the-penguin.otak.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030620163349.GG17563@work.bitmover.com> <20030621142048.2ae63afa.skraw@ithnet.com> <20030621133831.GA10089@work.bitmover.com> <1056358467.29264.41.camel@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> <20030623132231.GC6715@work.bitmover.com> <3EF70EF8.3050107@coyotegulch.com> <20030623150616.GA20103@work.bitmover.com> <1056382357.29264.281.camel@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> <20030623153952.GB20103@work.bitmover.com> <20030626174520.GA3710@fs.tum.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030626174520.GA3710@fs.tum.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=0.5, required 7, AWL, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 679 Lines: 16 On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 07:45:21PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > That's probably a good enough test case. Explain to me how your support > > contracts are ever going to provide enough money to redo GCC or build > > something equally substantial. > > [incremental changes given as example] Incremental changes != redo. Redo is a ~$10M project. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/