Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264158AbTF0Kws (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 06:52:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264178AbTF0Kws (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 06:52:48 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:55364 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264158AbTF0Kws (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 06:52:48 -0400 From: Alan Cox Message-Id: <200306271107.h5RB72x32196@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Subject: Re: O_DIRECT To: sct@redhat.com (Stephen C. Tweedie) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:07:02 -0400 (EDT) Cc: alan@redhat.com (Alan Cox), sct@redhat.com (Stephen Tweedie), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (linux-kernel) In-Reply-To: <1056710121.2418.19.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com> from "Stephen C. Tweedie" at Meh 27, 2003 11:35:21 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 646 Lines: 13 > Ouch ouch ouch, there's nasty merge conflict between the O_DIRECT patch > and an existing 64-bit rlimit chunk in -ac3. You really, really want > the change below. :-) Marcelo's tree appears OK, and this is a common > code path for all filesystems in -ac, so it matches the failure patterns > that far. Ouch indeed - ok thats good, that means its not the O_DIRECT stuff. Thanks for figuring it out - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/