Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264188AbTF0L0V (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:26:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264190AbTF0L0V (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:26:21 -0400 Received: from mail.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.8]:41483 "HELO heather.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S264188AbTF0L0U (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:26:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:40:42 +0200 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: "Robert White" Cc: david.lang@digitalinsight.com, lm@bitmover.com, wa@almesberger.net, miquels@cistron-office.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Troll Tech [was Re: Sco vs. IBM] Message-Id: <20030627134042.435c20f9.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20030627014540.3da01dc9.skraw@ithnet.com> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.2 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2199 Lines: 47 On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:57:36 -0700 "Robert White" wrote: > Stephen, > > So given this responsibility he has chosen to take, that you admire, Sorry, I said "respect", I didn't mean and say "admire". > and > that I have no aspirations towards because I already know it isn't an area I > will do well in... > > Is it responsible for him to pose a question about the source and nature of > innovation and then reply to the feedback he receives with "you've never run > a business so why should I listen to you"? Well, as all of the writers and readers of this and other threads are free people (I hope), he has a choice. I would not critize someone for his personal choice in such a matter, you may call it wrong from your point of view, but this is simply called "different opinions". > Is it responsible to start with the assumption that business is innovation > and non business is, by definition, *not* innovation? His position only > makes sense if this founding position ("business is the sole source of > meaningful innovation in software") is true. He will entertain no dissent > on that position no matter how many innovators claim otherwise. >From the deepest ground of my heart I would say: YES. He has a right to think, say and do whatever he likes as long as it does not interfere with rights of others. I think you left the thread (already quite off-topic for LKML) and got to the "free speech" topic (completely off-topic for LKML). This is really a discussion, Rob. In a discussion you will meet all flavors of people including ones that don't like you or your sayings. Others may even ignore you completely. I think it's their right to do so. We are discussing a controverse topic here, so you can expect to convince nobody but yourself. Nevertheless you are free to talk about your personal opinion, because it gives others at least a chance to think about it, even if they don't tell you. Regards, Stephan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/