Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264372AbTF0OZF (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:25:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264374AbTF0OZF (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:25:05 -0400 Received: from c17870.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.248.224]:4540 "EHLO mail.kolivas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264372AbTF0OY7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:24:59 -0400 From: Con Kolivas Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 00:41:38 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline To: linux kernel mailing list Subject: [BENCHMARK] O1int patch with contest Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Description: clearsigned data Message-Id: <200306280041.47619.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3095 Lines: 72 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've had some (off list) requests to see if the interactivity patch I posted shows any differences in contest. To be honest I wasn't sure it would, and this is not quite what I expected. Below is a 2.5.73-mm1 patched with patch-O1int-0306271816 (2.5.73-O1i) compared to 2.5.73-mm1 with contest (http://contest.kolivas.org). no_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.73-O1i 1 78 93.6 0.0 0.0 1.00 2.5.73-mm1 1 77 94.8 0.0 0.0 1.00 cacherun: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.73-O1i 1 75 97.3 0.0 0.0 0.96 2.5.73-mm1 1 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.97 process_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.73-O1i 1 94 78.7 39.0 20.2 1.21 2.5.73-mm1 2 108 67.6 67.0 29.6 1.40 ctar_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.73-O1i 1 86 84.9 0.0 0.0 1.10 2.5.73-mm1 3 103 74.8 0.0 0.0 1.34 xtar_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.73-O1i 1 92 80.4 1.0 3.3 1.18 2.5.73-mm1 3 113 66.4 2.0 4.4 1.47 io_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.73-O1i 1 101 73.3 24.6 12.9 1.29 2.5.73-mm1 4 127 59.1 39.7 16.5 1.65 io_other: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.73-O1i 1 95 78.9 22.7 11.6 1.22 2.5.73-mm1 2 112 67.9 43.0 19.6 1.45 read_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.73-O1i 1 92 80.4 2.7 2.2 1.18 2.5.73-mm1 2 100 76.0 7.8 7.0 1.30 list_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.73-O1i 1 87 86.2 0.0 1.1 1.12 2.5.73-mm1 2 93 80.6 0.0 7.5 1.21 mem_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.73-O1i 1 84 86.9 35.0 1.2 1.08 2.5.73-mm1 2 114 68.4 54.0 1.8 1.48 dbench_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.73-O1i 1 222 33.3 2.0 31.5 2.85 2.5.73-mm1 4 365 20.8 5.0 48.2 4.74 I promise I didn't tune it with contest results in mind. There are still things I want to do to it that may not affect these results. Con -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+/FekF6dfvkL3i1gRAhHUAJwOiLq+u3nEGn9Ym+c5x4JpTqrK1ACfX79F WKLTsbtqwXyFpOZ+i+JvgVU= =nQk2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/