Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264407AbTF0OnW (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:43:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264424AbTF0OnW (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:43:22 -0400 Received: from smtp.bitmover.com ([192.132.92.12]:64687 "EHLO smtp.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264407AbTF0OnT (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:43:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:57:27 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Alan Cox Cc: Larry McVoy , Vojtech Pavlik , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: bkbits.net is down Message-ID: <20030627145727.GB18676@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Alan Cox , Larry McVoy , Vojtech Pavlik , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20030621135812.GE14404@work.bitmover.com> <20030621190944.GA13396@work.bitmover.com> <20030622002614.GA16225@work.bitmover.com> <20030623053713.GA6715@work.bitmover.com> <20030625013302.GB2525@work.bitmover.com> <20030626231752.E5633@ucw.cz> <20030626212102.GA19056@work.bitmover.com> <1056711200.3174.23.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1056711200.3174.23.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=0.5, required 7, AWL, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1074 Lines: 25 On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 11:53:20AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Iau, 2003-06-26 at 22:21, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > Eek. Serverworks IDE. I don't think they ever got that bit of their > > > chipset right. > > > > Hmm. I could shove in a promise card and put at least the repos on that, > > would that be better? > > Serverworks OSB4 IDE had a few problems that we now deal with. > Serverworks CSB5/CSB6 (Ie anything vaguely current) is great and hasn't > had many problems at all. > > There are some small updates from Duncan in the 2.4.21 tree but nothing > "wrong" has been fixed for quite some time. Is there a PCI EIDE card that you could suggest that would be ultra stable? Or should I just toss this box and go build up another one? -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/