Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264741AbTF0PXd (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:23:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264766AbTF0PXc (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:23:32 -0400 Received: from c17870.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.248.224]:33469 "EHLO mail.kolivas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264741AbTF0PXT (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:23:19 -0400 From: Con Kolivas To: Felipe Alfaro Solana Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] O1int patch with contest Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 01:40:08 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: linux kernel mailing list References: <200306280041.47619.kernel@kolivas.org> <1056727700.584.3.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> In-Reply-To: <1056727700.584.3.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200306280140.08726.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1643 Lines: 36 On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 01:28, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 16:41, Con Kolivas wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > I've had some (off list) requests to see if the interactivity patch I > > posted shows any differences in contest. To be honest I wasn't sure it > > would, and this is not quite what I expected. Below is a 2.5.73-mm1 > > patched with patch-O1int-0306271816 (2.5.73-O1i) compared to 2.5.73-mm1 > > with contest (http://contest.kolivas.org). > > These are good news, indeed. The patch is getting better and better, but > I'm still seeing XMMS audio skips when clicking on a URL inside > Evolution (and using Konqueror as my web browser), and sometimes when > moving windows around. > > Also, it seems that nicing the X server to -20 causes it to get CPU at > discontinuous bursts, causing window movement to be somewhat jerky. The > overall feeling for the X server is better at a default nice of 0. Isn't > this curious? Not curious at all. I should have made it clear I was in _no_ way recommending renicing X. It should be left at nice 0 and the scheduler decide what is interactive. Renicing X will guarantee you of getting audio skips. There is still the problem of apps started during heavy loads. While the last patch helps a little, I have to do some more work on the algorithm and make it smarter to help a lot. Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/