Subject: Re: bkbits.net is down
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
Cc: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030627145727.GB18676@work.bitmover.com>
References: <20030621135812.GE14404@work.bitmover.com>
	 <20030621190944.GA13396@work.bitmover.com>
	 <20030622002614.GA16225@work.bitmover.com>
	 <20030623053713.GA6715@work.bitmover.com>
	 <20030625013302.GB2525@work.bitmover.com> <20030626231752.E5633@ucw.cz>
	 <20030626212102.GA19056@work.bitmover.com>
	 <1056711200.3174.23.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
	 <20030627145727.GB18676@work.bitmover.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1056728645.3174.48.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: 27 Jun 2003 16:44:05 +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 725
Lines: 14

On Gwe, 2003-06-27 at 15:57, Larry McVoy wrote:
> Is there a PCI EIDE card that you could suggest that would be ultra stable?
> Or should I just toss this box and go build up another one?

PCI ones tend to be the most problematic. The on board CSB5/CSB6 should be
very reliable. Failing that you really get to choose between promise, highpoint
and SI (SI/CMD680). The CMD680 driver has had a few problems compared with the
others but docs exist under NDA. I'd use the onboard IDE

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/