Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264687AbTF0S3z (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:29:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264683AbTF0S3z (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:29:55 -0400 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.133]:7594 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264687AbTF0S3x (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:29:53 -0400 Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.73-bk3, -bk4, -mjb1 regression test results From: Dave Hansen To: Mark Peloquin Cc: linux-kernel , linstab , ltp-results In-Reply-To: <3EFC8E3D.6050505@austin.ibm.com> References: <3EFC8E3D.6050505@austin.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1056739431.9085.21.camel@nighthawk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 27 Jun 2003 11:43:51 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 531 Lines: 19 On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 11:34, Mark Peloquin wrote: > Nightly Regression Summary > for ... Have you ever had these regression tests run against the same kernel? say, 2.5.73 vs 2.5.73 How often do you see improvements or regressions reported then? -- Dave Hansen haveblue@us.ibm.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/