Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752275AbdHJBgR (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2017 21:36:17 -0400 Received: from LGEAMRELO12.lge.com ([156.147.23.52]:50132 "EHLO lgeamrelo12.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752091AbdHJBgQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2017 21:36:16 -0400 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.127 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.222.33 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 10:35:02 +0900 From: Byungchul Park To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, walken@google.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, kirill@shutemov.name, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org, npiggin@gmail.com, kernel-team@lge.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 11/14] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to PG_locked locks Message-ID: <20170810013501.GY20323@X58A-UD3R> References: <1502089981-21272-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> <1502089981-21272-12-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1502089981-21272-12-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 509 Lines: 10 On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 04:12:58PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > Although lock_page() and its family can cause deadlock, the lock > correctness validator could not be applied to them until now, becasue > things like unlock_page() might be called in a different context from > the acquisition context, which violates lockdep's assumption. > > Thanks to CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE, we can now apply the lockdep > detector to page locks. Applied it. Is there any reason excluding applying it into PG_locked?