Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752216AbdHJHFW (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2017 03:05:22 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:41388 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751417AbdHJHFV (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2017 03:05:21 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 09:05:18 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Wei Wang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mst@redhat.com, mawilcox@microsoft.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, david@redhat.com, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net, aarcange@redhat.com, amit.shah@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, liliang.opensource@gmail.com, yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com, quan.xu@aliyun.com Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v13 4/5] mm: support reporting free page blocks Message-ID: <20170810070517.GB23863@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1501742299-4369-1-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <1501742299-4369-5-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <20170803091151.GF12521@dhcp22.suse.cz> <59895668.9090104@intel.com> <59895B71.7050709@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <59895B71.7050709@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1162 Lines: 35 On Tue 08-08-17 14:34:25, Wei Wang wrote: > On 08/08/2017 02:12 PM, Wei Wang wrote: > >On 08/03/2017 05:11 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >>On Thu 03-08-17 14:38:18, Wei Wang wrote: > >>This is just too ugly and wrong actually. Never provide struct page > >>pointers outside of the zone->lock. What I've had in mind was to simply > >>walk free lists of the suitable order and call the callback for each > >>one. > >>Something as simple as > >> > >> for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_ZONES; i++) { > >> struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[i]; > >> > >> if (!populated_zone(zone)) > >> continue; > > > >Can we directly use for_each_populated_zone(zone) here? yes, my example couldn't because I was still assuming per-node API > >>spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags); > >> for (order = min_order; order < MAX_ORDER; ++order) { > > > > > >This appears to be covered by for_each_migratetype_order(order, mt) below. yes but #define for_each_migratetype_order(order, type) \ for (order = 0; order < MAX_ORDER; order++) \ for (type = 0; type < MIGRATE_TYPES; type++) so you would have to skip orders < min_order -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs