Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264762AbTF0UId (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:08:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264763AbTF0UId (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:08:33 -0400 Received: from fmr02.intel.com ([192.55.52.25]:10222 "EHLO caduceus.fm.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264762AbTF0UI3 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:08:29 -0400 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 Subject: RE: ipc semaphore optimization Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:22:42 -0700 Message-ID: <41F331DBE1178346A6F30D7CF124B24B2A486F@fmsmsx409.fm.intel.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: ipc semaphore optimization Thread-Index: AcM85FvEd7H0GQVWQyib2BHyWcUigAABRGvA From: "Chen, Kenneth W" To: "Manfred Spraul" Cc: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jun 2003 20:22:43.0422 (UTC) FILETIME=[DD4ACFE0:01C33CE9] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 517 Lines: 15 > Perhaps the O(1) scheduler is better at handling the thread switches > than the old scheduler. Could you include an update of the comments into > your patch? Yes, our opinion align with your observation as well. The O(1) scheduler handles the ctx much better. - Ken - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/